The Hire That Never Happened
AI job destruction is real, but it does not look like mass layoffs. A Yale study of twelve industries finds companies using AI to get more from existing staff while quietly closing the door to new hires. Computer science graduates now have higher unemployment than humanities majors, and the share of workers who say it is a good time to find a job has collapsed from 70% in 2022 to 28% today.
Read full story →Robots Report for Duty: The Physical AI Moment Has Arrived
From a humanoid robot delaying a Southwest Airlines flight over its battery size, to Japan Airlines deploying robots at Haneda Airport to address labour shortages, to Chinese machines welding on vertical chemical plant walls via VR remote control: physical AI has moved from demonstration to deployment. Meta's acquisition of Assured Robot Intelligence signals where big tech is heading next.
Read full story →OpenAI and Anthropic Each Launched a Joint Venture Monday. Then Their Strategies Split.
Both labs announced enterprise joint ventures within hours of each other: OpenAI's $4B Deployment Company and Anthropic's $1.5B partnership with Blackstone and Goldman Sachs. Then the OpenClaw story revealed their fundamental difference: OpenAI opened its ChatGPT subscription to 3.2 million agent users; Anthropic blocked them. One company saw a cost problem. The other saw a distribution opportunity.
Read full story →The Freeze Is the Point
The AI jobs debate fixates on layoffs because layoffs are visible. But the Yale data shows a different mechanism: companies are not firing workers, they are simply stopping the intake of new ones. This is not a side effect of AI adoption. It is the adoption. And a society that cannot get young people onto the first rung of the economic ladder is not managing a transition: it is living through a structural break.
Read opinion →